Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
From my understanding, leadership happens at different levels,it may start at individual level, group, task force or even at organization and this basically happens due to the interaction and exchanges among people with shared goals… For example the interaction between employees and their managers, the interaction between the team members and so many different levels but all these cant happen without Direction, Allignment and commitment at all levels.
From my understanding Leadership happens in the interactions and exchanges among people with shared work,leadership can happening in the
teams, workgroups, task forces, divisions, communities and whole organizations. Leadership can be happening across a teams, levels, and functions.Whether within a team, workgroup, task force, division, department, community, or an entire organization, there must be a clear sense of shared direction, alignment, and commitment. The group needs agreement about its direction and what they are trying to accomplish together; they must have alignment for effective coordination of the work in service of their shared direction; and members with commitment prioritize the success of the collective.
These three outcomes—direction, alignment, and commitment (DAC for short) make it possible for individuals
to work together willingly and effectively to realize collective achievements. So when I say making leadership
happen, I mean making direction, alignment, and commitment happen. Therefore, I think the only way to know
if leadership has happened is to look for the presence of three outcomes.History of your life style-leader as leader if people accept you to select to be a leader must look a historical background of your life and then you access you if you fit to be a leader you can select and also if you haven’t a bad behavior like thief or anything you can disappointed to select to be a leader.
Knowledge and skills- if support to be a leader this things we check if you have enough knowledge which support to understand and evaluated and resolve the problem which occur infront of you without hurt any one and how can support your organization to focus in development.
Language- language is the best way communication how introduce to people how can communicate with people these can access you and support you to people to select and understand you for comunicate to using good language and polite language to people or organization.
Participation to people (group, meeting)-if you participate with people for the aim of learn to increase your skills and add something for people to perform well in organization.
Behavior- if you select and confirmed to other must behavior well to people who surrounding infront of others and people learn more from you.
Qualification to be leader – example if you be a leader must be qualified some section, education, cooperation and work performance if you done well for the must select and you convince people to accept you in the organization.Leadership is the ability to mobilize people with towards accomplishment of a common goal. Great Leadership means being consistent day after day regardless of circumstances. Leaderships requires a person who can inspire people to act to the best of their ability to strive for a shared goal.
In Contemporary leadership a leader believes and invest in the people who are being led. Contemporary leaders have collaborative mindset and learn from others’ experience. In contemporary leadership a leader provides equal support for all and also sees leadership in other. High Impact Leadership is kind of leadership that invest in personal growth first in order to accomplish the goals set. High impact leadership relies on influence a person has to implement strategies to accomplish the goal.Dear@Aleck
From my understanding the important characteristics of the Mind of high impact leader 1.high impact leader have a positive mindset they learn from their mistake not bleam others also they challenge themselves first before they challenge the team
2.They believe true success is defined according to the impact they have on a particular organisation or society@Gloria Thanks for the emphasis that took me back to cement my knowledge on the differences of these two theories…. Today I was checking in Dr. Bujari’s biography and I found that he prefers servant theory of leadership throughout his career of leadership.
@aleck I don’t think so contingency theory is look similar with servant theory because
Contingency leadership Theory acknowledges that there is no single best approach to leadership, it attempts to identify the style of leadership that works best in each different type of Situation, Changing leadership styles to suit particular situations involves.
While Servant leadership occurs when the leader’s main goal and responsibility is to provide service to their people.
Due to this any leadership style it’s been the way it is because of the situation occur so that according to contingency theory servant leadership occur because of Situation.Do you guys look at this contingency theory as I do? It seems like it is very similar to servant theory… Or how do you see it?
I think servant leadership theory does not work only to those who prompt to lead with their own potentials mindset because they will always put themselves instead of the others and their goals.. For example, I want to lead a group of individuals because I heard that they are about to be offered either loans so that I earn them first… This is very contrary to servant theory
